|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Summ Dude
Direct Action Resources
290
   |
Posted - 2014.03.13 03:25:00 -
[1] - Quote
My most recent thread was locked almost immediately after it's creation by Logibro. You'll notice his given reason was that it was a "duplicate topic", and he subsequently linked the latest Dev Blog thread. You'll also notice the topic of my thread was asking the Devs what their reasoning behind not including Dropsuit Upgrades in the 1.8 respec was. Given all of this, I submit that logically, the Devs are now required to answer my question in the latest Dev Blog thread. Otherwise, my thread asking a specific question was in fact not a duplicate thread, and should therefore be unlocked.
Make sense?
Not just a laymen, but the laymen.
Winn Summ and lose Summ.
|
Summ Dude
Direct Action Resources
290
|
Posted - 2014.03.13 03:45:00 -
[2] - Quote
Lanius Pulvis wrote:It seems to pass the sniff test.
That's all we can hope for. 
Not just a laymen, but the laymen.
Winn Summ and lose Summ.
|
Summ Dude
Direct Action Resources
291
|
Posted - 2014.03.13 05:16:00 -
[3] - Quote
Forever ETC wrote:Locked for linking locked thread
Such charming alliteration.
Not just a laymen, but the laymen.
Winn Summ and lose Summ.
|
Summ Dude
Direct Action Resources
291
|
Posted - 2014.03.13 05:21:00 -
[4] - Quote
Magnus Amadeuss wrote:actually locked for discussing moderation ( a bit like naz- germany eh?)
Hm, is this even technically a discussion of moderation? More like basic logic, in my opinion.
Not just a laymen, but the laymen.
Winn Summ and lose Summ.
|
Summ Dude
Direct Action Resources
291
|
Posted - 2014.03.13 05:42:00 -
[5] - Quote
Ghosts Chance wrote:you also kept trying to ask this in IRC and KNEW before hand it would be locked...
wich is why it was locked....
I'm sorry, how did I know it was going to be locked?
Not just a laymen, but the laymen.
Winn Summ and lose Summ.
|
Summ Dude
Direct Action Resources
291
|
Posted - 2014.03.13 06:06:00 -
[6] - Quote
Ghosts Chance wrote:Summ Dude wrote:Ghosts Chance wrote:you also kept trying to ask this in IRC and KNEW before hand it would be locked...
wich is why it was locked.... I'm sorry, how did I know it was going to be locked? not my fault you diddnt see our warnings in IRC
Your warnings? Don't see how that means I should've known my thread would be locked. Or how it in anyway diminishes the point I'm making.
Not just a laymen, but the laymen.
Winn Summ and lose Summ.
|
Summ Dude
Direct Action Resources
291
|
Posted - 2014.03.13 06:45:00 -
[7] - Quote
Ghosts Chance wrote:Summ Dude wrote:Ghosts Chance wrote:Summ Dude wrote:Ghosts Chance wrote:you also kept trying to ask this in IRC and KNEW before hand it would be locked...
wich is why it was locked.... I'm sorry, how did I know it was going to be locked? not my fault you diddnt see our warnings in IRC Your warnings? Don't see how that means I should've known my thread would be locked. Or how it in anyway diminishes the point I'm making. well your point is that because you made the exact same thread as a crapton of other people and got redirected to the same place they did that means they HAVE to answer your question right? well your question isnt getting answered... it isnt.... also we discussed it at length in IRC and we all awknowledged that this game monotizes SP, its how it makes its money and as such CCP wishs to minimise any SP refunds to those that are absolutly 100% nessesary. the CPM made the case on behalf of the players and CCP awknowledged that it couldnt get away with not giving us back the dropsuit command skills, BUT since this games core is teh sale of SP they will not budge any further then that. this conversation was going on the entire time you were constantly trying to ask your questions... you were just so hung up on reciving the answer you wanted that you diddnt take part in the actual conversation. in short lockingbro locked your thread becuase you werent listening to the answers in IRC when you ask a question, listen to the answer next time rather then continuing on spamming your question.
No, my point is that I asked a specific question, and my thread was locked for apparently being a "duplicate" thread. Logically, this means that there must eventually be an answer to my specific question in that thread that Logibro linked. Otherwise, how was my thread a duplicate?
Not just a laymen, but the laymen.
Winn Summ and lose Summ.
|
Summ Dude
Direct Action Resources
294
|
Posted - 2014.03.13 08:18:00 -
[8] - Quote
Lorhak Gannarsein wrote:Woah this didn't get locked?
Sheesh, Logibro! You're off your game!!
I wonder, does this thread actually break any forum rules? I'm not sure.
Not just a laymen, but the laymen.
Winn Summ and lose Summ.
|
|
|
| |
|